Categories
Newsletter

The Modern Butlers’ Journal for Service Professionals Worldwide, May, 2012

BlueLogo2011web The Modern Butlers’ Journal for Service Professionals Worldwide, February, 2012

The Modern Butlers’ Journal volume 8, issue 5

International Institute of Modern Butlers

IIMB Chairman Steven Ferry The Modern Butlers’ Journal for Service Professionals Worldwide, February, 2012Message from the Chairman

One of our colleagues in the profession is on trial because he took action to protect his employer and family, as he saw it. Details below, but I look forward to your comments on the subject. Any one of us could find ourselves in a similar situation in the future, so it would be good to learn from this situation, perhaps.

 Letters to the Editor

 Photo by Janos Feher

A quick question for which I have found no answers in etiquette literature about funerals: are we expected to write “Thank you” letters only in response to condolence letters, or to those who signed a funeral book as well? For the former there is no doubt the answer is yes, of course; but for the latter I am note sure if one is expected to write to them, especially if the individuals did not leave their address. GL

Ed: I am not aware of any formal statement on this matter, and it would be hard to create points of etiquette to cover every single eventuality in life: there has to be a point where common sense and application of basic concepts takes over. In this case, I would suggest that a “Thank you” is not required or expected for simply signing one’s name; but it would certainly be courteous to thank an individual for coming and sharing in the experience and homage if they chose to fill out their address—in a way signaling some further communication would not be amiss.

****

The following exchange with a butler in the Americas might be instructive for other butlers who sometimes feel that they are not in the ideal position and feel inclined to look elsewhere—often, a little patience will see things come out right.

I graduated from a Butler School a year ago and am finding my family a little stressful to work for, as the Mrs. is never happy with anything we (the staff) do. It gets you down when you put everything into a job only to have them ignored. I am thinking of leaving even though it’s not good to be at a job for only a year. Have you heard of other butlers in similar situations to mine?

Ed: Thank you for asking. Sorry to hear you have been experiencing what many other butlers have learned the hard way: to vet employers before working for them, just as they vet you. That is why we recommend at least a month and preferably a three-month trial period before moving in lock, stock, and barrel, committing to a relationship that may not work out either way. Of course, as with any relationship, it takes some give and take and tolerance to make it work, and there is always the possibility that a relationship could be made viable, even if not ideal. However, if the employer is never happy with anything done, even when it is very well done and according to her wishes, then you are better off ending the relationship, even if it will make future potential employers look askance at you, wondering if you are a job hopper. The alternative, as you say, is you will be gotten “down,” and it will be repeatedly until you stay down. Decisions, decisions, decisions, but to answer your question, yes, your situation is not unusual: this is Planet Earth, after all, where things do not always follow the ideal.

You will be pleased to know that I and the other student at the butler academy both had your book at our sides and used it to verify and supplement discussions, etc. Anyway, I am committed to giving two-months notice even though my contract says nothing about any notice being required:  I would like to know they have a suitable replacement lined up.

Ed: I am glad to hear the book was useful. Yes, that is enough notice, and it is good you would like to ensure there is someone to replace you. I wish you well wherever you end up.

I just spoke with my placement agency. They tell me the current house manager will be replaced at the end of the month.  The placement agency would like me to give this new leader a chance and see if it improves things within the house.  They also said four week notice would be brilliant.  This is not a problem for me.

Ed: On the new leader, is the problem something else, or is it the Mrs.? If it is the Mrs., then a new leader will run into the same issue. If it be the current leader, and he has made everything so bad that the Mrs. is quite correct to be upset at everything being done, then I could understand your being willing to continue. Just a thought about the inconsistencies.

The problem is with both, but I think the leader certainly does not help the current situation. I will see if Mrs. is more reasonable with a more organized leader in place. Thanks for you time and advise.

***

Thank you so much for your article. Yours are always worthy reading. MR, Magazine Editor

Butlers in the Media

Pascal Bonnefoy, the former butler of L’Oreal heiress, Liliane Bettencourt, has been charged with violating her privacy after he secretly recorded her conversations with advisers to prove they may have been manipulating his aged employer. He handed the information over to his employer’s daughter who was attempting to stop others from taking advantage of her mother.

Was he correct to have done this? It is a good example of a tricky, real-life situation with various angles to consider. Please feel free to write your thoughts.

One angle is that of ethics, and this is raised, also, in the matter of the upcoming movie, The Butler, about Eugene Allen, the White House butler between 1952 to 1986. Forest  Whitaker will portray him and Oprah Winfrey is apparently playing Mrs. Allen,  with Jane Fonda, Hugh Jackman, Liam Neeson, and John Cusack reportedly portraying various presidents and their wives. This much may not be so new, but the movie does include interplay with the butler’s son, who is an activist who is repeatedly arrested, and which does rub off on the butler toward the end of his life—even though, naturally, he is a conformist—when he makes a decision to fight (according to Forest Whitaker). This theme repeats one first broached in Remains of the Day, when fellow butler Mr. Benn questions Mr. Steven’s blind support for questionable activities on the part of his employer.

***

Butlers, Real and Unreal

The Jerusalem Post carries a story entitled “An Executive Butler” which describes an enterprising gentleman who runs a cleaning company and concierge service.

Similarly, Glenn Close’s excellent performance as a hotel waiter in Albert Nobb has the character still being described repeatedly in much of the media as “a butler.”

A good article on Sean Davoren, Head Butler at the Savoy in London.

Cigars, Part III

frankmitchell The Modern Butlers’ Journal for Service Professionals Worldwide, February, 2012 by Frank Mitchell 

Harvesting & Processing Tobacco Part 2

For the next step in the process, the tobacco will typically travel to the factory where it will be rolled into cigars. Here the leaves are sorted according to how they will be used; small or broken leaves for the filler, large course leaves for the binder, and large fine (often shade-grown) leaves for the wrapper.

Tobacco leaf sorting equipment (photo: Words & Images)

Each type is collected into bunches of 10 -15 leaves called “hands” and placed together with similar leaves to ferment. The leaves may ferment in a wooden box or cask called a hogshead, or they may be moistened and stitched up in a burlap-covered bale. In the 18th century, hogsheads were popular for shipping, as the tobacco packed in the New World would ferment en-route to the cigar-making establishments in Europe.

Tobacco press and weighing equipment (photo: Words & Images)

 

For cigars rolled in the country of origin, fermentation took place in the cool cellars of the tobacco rolling factories. These cellars are still used for some Cuban brands today as the temperature inside remains fairly constant, making them ideal for the task.

The fermentation process must be closely watched. If fermentation is allowed to accelerate, the temperature in the bale will rise too high, damaging the tobacco. The bale will often be pulled open and inspected over the years – the leaves being turned over and moistened again if necessary. If the temperature and humidity is not controlled properly, the leaves will either rot or disintegrate.

Fermentation can take as little as six months, but for fine cigars it usually takes anything from two to five years. Of all the tobacco production processes, none has as much effect on the flavour, aroma and burning characteristics as the fermenting process.

Once the tobacco has been fermented, it is ready for rolling. The bales or hogsheads are broken up and the leaves separated. The spine of the leaf must be removed to allow the leaf to burn evenly. This can either be done with a treadle-operated machine, or by hand with a knife mounted on a thimble—a small cut being made near the tip of the leaf and the spine pulled down. The cut leaves are stacked in piles called books or pads and may even be wrapped up in bales for further fermentation.

When the leaves are ready finally for rolling into cigars, the bales will be broken up for the last time and the leaves steamed to restore lost humidity before they are sorted yet again.

Before the finished cigars are shipped, they will be sorted a few more times and graded—a process requiring great skill and experience (most visitors to cigar factories are not able to see any difference between the leaves in adjacent piles), thereby contributing to the quality and consistency of the final product. A fine, handmade cigar costs as much as it does in part because it will have been handled by as many as forty pairs of hands before the consumer ever smokes it.

Next month we look at an even more advanced skill, that of rolling the cigar.

Let’s Talk about Wine, Part V

Amer1x1inch The Modern Butlers’ Journal for Service Professionals Worldwide, February, 2012 by Amer Vargas 

Champagne, Part II

So, what does “Méthode Champenoise” involve today? The starting point is the same as any wine making, that is, harvesting the best grapes at the right time after months of very attentive care, and taking them for pressing shortly thereafter. For Champagne, the harvest is carried out earlier than grapes for other kinds of wine, to take advantage of the low levels of sugar and the higher levels of acidity. Then, with regards to the pressing, in the case of Pinot Noir and Pinot Meunier it’s done without allowing the must to stay in contact with the skins, so that it doesn’t extract the color—except in the case of musts that are used to make pink Champagne. The first 2,050 liters out of 4000 kg of grapes is called cuvee and is the must that will produce better and more delicate wines, whilst the must after that, called taille (tail), produces coarser wines. Some vintners use only cuvées to produce their champagne, which assures a very high-quality libation.

Vary rarely, the musts are fermented in barrels, as stainless steel tanks allow a tighter control of the changes in the first fermentation that lasts around 15 days.

After the first fermentation, vintners decide whether to bottle the wine on their own or make a cuvée  (yes, like the first wine coming out of a batch of grapes), meaning blending the wine of one main varietals with other wines from the other main varietals, or with a very little percentage of a different grape.

From here on, the wine will age in the bottle after adding a little bit of rock sugar and a few grams of yeast. The bottle is topped with a crown cap and allowed to age no less than 15 months for non-vintage (wines from different years) or three years or more for vintage (wines from a particular, generally excellent, year).

What happens is that the yeasts will develop in the wine and so produce carbon dioxide. As the gas cannot escape, the C02 dissolves in the liquid and thus Champagne acquires its characteristic effervescent condition.

As Dom Pérignon improved, the bottles that hold Champagne (and generally speaking, any sparkling wine) are a bit thicker than the regular wine bottles, having a “dome” at the bottom called a “punt” that increases the strength of the bottle base to prevent it from exploding.
The second fermentation starts with the bottles lying horizontally, and during the ensuing, months, their position is changed until they finish vertical and upside down; at the same time, either mechanically or manually, the bottles are twisted so that the lees (remains of yeasts and sugars) accumulate in the neck of the bottle, forming a debris cap.

When the second fermentation has finished, the neck of the bottle is frozen in order to solidify this debris, the crown cap is removed, and the pressure inside the bottle forces out the debris.

Care of Silver

 by Jeffrey Herman

Silver Terminology

Tarnish

Tarnish on silver is a thin layer of mainly of black silver sulfide caused by the silver’s chemical reaction with sulfur-containing compounds such as hydrogen sulfide in the air. Tarnish appears as a yellow, gray, or black film on objects, and the corrosion process slows as the silver sulfide layer thickens. Clean silver tarnishes more rapidly than tarnished silver.

For complete instructions on how to remove tarnish and enjoy using your silver with little or no care, please visit my Silver Care Guide. If you have questions not addressed on that page, please feel free to contact me.

Patina

In the decorative metals world, patina can mean:

(1) The fine scratches on an object that have developed over time from its handling and polishing;

(2) The natural darkening that occurs in the recesses of ornamental pieces and engraving; or

(3) An applied chemical used to color metal.

 The coffeepot pictured below was cleaned with Tarn-X, which removed the factory-applied coloring.

The next image illustrates how the restoration of the factory-applied blackening in the recesses makes the design “pop.”

Next month, Mr. Herman will discuss the lacquering of silver in an effort to prevent tarnishing, and how to remove that lacquer.

Mr. Herman is the owner of Jeffrey Herman Silver Restoration & Conservation located in West Warwick, RI. He can be contacted via email jeff@hermansilver.com or by phone 1-800-339-0417. Or visit his website at www.hermansilver.com

Please subscribe

at the top right of this page

to continue to receive these newsletters.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter

The Institute is dedicated to raising service standards by broadly disseminating the mindset and skills of that time-honored, quintessential service provider, the British Butler, adapted to the needs of modern employers and guests in staffed homes, luxury hotels, resort,  spas, retirement communities, jets, yachts, & cruise ships around the world.

 

 

Categories
Published Articles

What is Behind the Gyrations of the World Economy and Where is It Going?

by Nick Ares

Do yourself a favor and skip this article if you prefer to think the ship is simply rolling heavily in the calm seas. The captain of the Good Ship Earth, I am afraid, has a very definite agenda that is taking it off the course everyone thinks it is on as they go about their lives: sitting down to dinner, sleeping peacefully. Nobody thinks the ship can sink, as big, beautiful, and safe as it is, but the truth is rocks tear holes in metal hulls and they turn turtle. So it is with our world economy: sail close enough, long enough to enough rocks, and the ship goes down, no matter how many people are opining on the matter with complex or oversimplified theories.

Being asked to state accurately the condition of the world’s economy during calm times is difficult enough; predicting where it might go next is pushing the envelope of possibilities. But trying to state and predict the condition of today’s and tomorrow’s straining yacht in the thirty foot swells of today’s economy is as adventurous as navigating the real thing. At the risk of turning turtle in the explaining—if someone stands up to say something and is not willing to make a fool of himself, he is probably too timid to be standing there in the first place—I offer the below, simply because in any activity, if one cannot see ahead, one is sailing blind and liable to hit the rocks.

After my last article on the economy, Don’t Just Sit There, many hoteliers around the world commented on the apparent inadequacies of fixing the global financial system by issuing more credit to failed institutions while withholding it from the real economy. The continued contagion of the real economy by financial sector excesses has continued to result in wobbliness for the productive side of the economies in the US and Europe, and by extension, the rest of the world.

So where is the economy heading: onto the rocks and whirlpools or across a vast ocean at breakneck speed, the wind filling the sails? And what can we expect in the service industries in particular, for owners, operators, and employees of hospitality venues, for guests, both the wealthy and economy-minded, and closer to home, for those in my profession of butlers, and their employers who need the wherewithal to support their lifestyles?

Certainly, some 2012 predictions for hospitality offer grounds for cautious optimism—a PricewaterhouseCoopers report shows 2011 to have been a good year for occupancy in the US, up at 60.1%, RevPAR increasing by 8.2, and ADR growing by 3.7%. Based on a predicted increase in business travel and group bookings, 2012 looks to be another good year, with occupancy predicted at 60.9%, ADR growth at 5.1% and RevPAR growth at 6.5%.

The World Economic Forum weighed in recently with the findings of a Marriott International survey showing that, in the opinions of opinion leaders, international travel stimulates the economy and we should do more of it. In concrete terms, international arrivals have doubled in the past decade and the UN World Tourism Organization predicts it will increase to one billion this year. The World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC) predicts an extra 69-million net jobs in the industry by 2021, 80% of which will be in Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa. In the US, one job is created for every 35 international visitors. WTTC also estimates worldwide GDP increases for the industry will rise by 4.2% annually to $9.226 trillion by 2021.

Certainly in the butler-training field, a small niche I have some familiarity with, there is much demand in the Far East and some in the West to support the general notion that things are improving.

Deloitte surveyed 1,000 business travelers in September 2011, 85% of who said they expected to travel in 2012 as much as, or more than, in 2011—Gen X and Y being the main drivers. The Global Business Travel Association recently predicted 2012 business travel will increase 4.6% over 2011, reaching $263 billion dollars—but then revealed that the increase was due to rising costs, not more travelers, and that the 2.1% increase in number of travelers during 2011 would decrease 0.8% in 2012.

To be sure, there are other rumblings of difficulties in our client bases. We can, perhaps, ignore the Chinese New Year astrology predictions for the Year of the Water Dragon being not so good for tourism and hospitality; but then the Chinese market is coming to the rescue of quite a few properties as they flood out of the region in mind-boggling numbers not seen since the forces of Ghengis Khan. If the Chinese were to take this prediction seriously, they might just bring it about.

According to Peter Yesawich, a growing number of mass affluent consumers (with household incomes of $125,000-$300,000) in the US has cut back on travel plans for various reasons boiling down to higher prices and their greater indebtedness/the economic realities. As the numbers quoted are between 51% and 68%, and 41% don’t have enough time to travel, limiting themselves to local weekend trips, we are talking about a significant market segment moving in the wrong direction from the hospitality perspective; as could be said of the number of millionaire households in the $1-9 million net-worth range, which has diminished by three million since 2010, having been inflated by home prices and stock market investments. A November 2011 Harris poll found 30% of the more-affluent Americans saying they will take a vacation for more than a week in the next six months, a 20% drop from the prior six months, because of uncertainty about the economy.

While there will always be those who travel intensively because their wealth permits it, a snapshot of the bulk of US consumers is not encouraging: they have lost $20 trillion in wealth since 2007, their homes having lost an average 30% in value, and twelve million homeowners are underwater; the actual unemployment rate of 22.5% reflects nine million jobs lost, with 48 million having no work at all in 2010, and 5.5 million filing for personal bankruptcy (2008 through 2011). Those with work are mostly struggling, as incomes have dropped 10% since the crash (a median of $504 a week), measured against a background of incomes increasing only by 1% since 1987, while the official cost of living increased 103% in that time, and is running currently at 10-12% per annum. Retirees and investors are feeling the pinch with interest rates almost zero. 77% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck, up from 43% in 2007, while Americans carry $798 billion in outstanding credit card balances at an average rate of 14%. 56 million Americans (18.5%) live at or below the poverty line in 2010, with a record 44.7 million on food stamps.

OK, enough already!

So what now, is the economy able to support the expansion anticipated? Well, it is easy to become introverted on US and European troubles—the rest of the world is enjoying growth rates averaging 7%, so they may be impacted by a drop in US and European guests, but these are not the only pebbles (guests) on the beach.

From the discordant voices pitching different ideas, it is not clear which way the economy will go, so more late nights of investigation lead to un-chartered territory and finally, to cut a long story short, falling precipitously down a large black hole, like Alice in Wonderland, into a place the author did not want to be—the kind of situation where a butler finds his boss in flagrante delicto with the maid, at the same time as the Mrs. is discovered elsewhere doing the same with the tennis coach. Too much information, but once known, it cannot be unknown. It can be kept to oneself, in true butler fashion, but anyone who has read the classic book or seen the movie, Remains of the Day, with Stevens, the butler (played by Sir Anthony Hopkins in the movie), strictly focusing on his work while his boss backs the wrong horse in the bigger picture results in ruination for both butler and boss. Philandering bosses is one thing, but something on the order of a spiraling economy is another, as it impacts so many people’s lives.

As Sir Winston Churchill once said, “The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.” And so, for better or worse, here it is—the cascading torrent of unwelcome revelations that kept me up late at night: make of it what you will.

Just as magicians rely on confusing their audience in order to make them see what they want them to see, so can a subject be made so confusing that nobody can understand it, not even the experts: such obfuscation has occurred with the subjects of economics and money. Do you really understand them? Indulge me while I lay out the basics which then make the departure from the fundamentals crystal clear:

Money is a means of moving beyond simple barter, which is impractical beyond a simple village environment; money is simply the assurance that coin, paper, digital entries or whatever other symbol is in use, will be accepted by those wanting to sell and buy to and from each other. The authority issuing the currency (or credit) has one key responsibility: to always keep the supply of money in balance with the amount of goods and services in circulation, so that there will always be enough money to produce and consume, but not so much that the money inflates (raising prices) or so little that it deflates (prevents production and purchase by its absence). What is the key here? Money simply represents produced services and goods already in existence or about to be brought into existence—allowing for their exchange, which is really what economics consists of.

The difficulties in communicating these fundamentals are a) that the minds of readers crammed with complex and incorrect information will freeze and they will be unable to think with these fundamentals; b) the eyes of those who cannot understand the subject at all may glaze over as they space out; and c) experts will decry how over-simplistic are these ideas. I sympathize. The best I can suggest is that the reader, if he finds himself so embarrassed, go over and over the above paragraph and see how it could be true.

If I haven’t lost you yet, then hang on, because the slide down the black hole becomes steeper at this point: if we believe President Franklin Roosevelt when he said: “In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way,” then we cannot simply accept that the sub-prime, predatory lending loans, the trillions (and perhaps quadrillions of dollars) in unsecured derivatives, the collapse of the economies of whole countries, could just be a case of bad judgment, untrammeled greed, poor planning, unpredictable market forces, nor bad luck.

And indeed they weren’t. Not to name any names, but brokerage houses mainly centered on Wall Street, have placed their men in the White House and US administrations for quite some time now, and they worked together with the privately owned central bank of the US (not naming names) to strip away any possibility of government oversight of their actions: they passed at least 14 key laws between 1989 and 2006 that gave them free rein in the financial sector, the results of which we see today in the US and Europe. If it were not for the fact that the privately held central bank for all major central banks then made an accounting rule change that forced all banks to reevaluate their portfolios drastically downwards,* sending them into instant insolvency and precipitating the crisis of 2008, and then insisted on keeping that rule in place so banks went under or were bailed out, the crash would not have happened.

* The Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, for instance, projected a quarterly loss of $44,000, but per the new accounting rule, ended up writing down the value of its mortgage-backed securities by $87.4 million and $98.7 million in the following quarter.

And at this point, we are in the twilight zone that Alice discovered in Wonderland, because further investigation shows, as William Pitt the Elder (Prime Minister of England during the 18th Century) said: “There is something behind the throne greater than the King himself.” He also said: “The little I know of it has not served to raise my opinion of what is vulgarly called the ‘Monied Interest;’ I mean, that blood-sucker, that muckworm,* that calls itself ‘the friend of government.’” He was referring to a relatively small group of individuals who, in his time, ruled England behind the scenes, and has since come to rule most of the world. This group handily pulls the strings behind our elected officials, and believes itself superior enough in intellect to determine our futures. If it were not for the fact that they scrambled their way to their current positions of power by at least twenty dishonest strategies that I have counted, and if their actions did not lay waste to countries at a time and their bewildered and suffering populaces, I would say “all power to them.”

* Muckworm: worm-shaped insect larva found in manure.

But that is not the way it is, their superior intelligence notwithstanding.

Just as it was not the place for Stevens the butler to tell Lord Darlington that he was making a mistake in supporting the Nazis—something he was to find out for himself after it was too late—it may not be my place to point this out, either. Certainly, a messenger’s lot is often unenviable, especially when the people of which he speaks bankrolled the Nazis in real life—but there comes a point where standing by while well-meaning individuals and groups, trying to determine their fate, are looking everywhere but the ceiling (where, to borrow from investigative report Matt Taibbi, there is a giant vampire squid controlling things unseen), would show a lack of moral fiber that cannot be countenanced in a butler.

For while the majority are working and hoping for good forward progress, the few who steer the boat actually have the ship heading straight for the rocks, and no matter how much you stoke the fires, keep the brass shining, and ensure your guests are comfortable, the ship will keep heading for the rocks unless someone pulls the wheel hard-a-port, and in a timely fashion. And there it is, just as Churchill said.

Conclusion: Do nothing and watch it all unfold, including the collapse in the value of the US dollar and perhaps Euro in the next year or two (lots of ramifications there for the hospitality industry) and the concomitant loss of business volume. Or become active in returning the US and other economies to a sound, production-oriented footing, with government issuing money and credit, and usurious personal and national debt to bankers a thing of the past.

The above is necessarily short and generalized: an easy-to-understand, thorough (and complimentary) ninety-page analysis is available—what it took eventually to write this article—including specific outcomes and action points.

Published initially by Hotel Executive magazine, March, 2012 

Also http://www.hotelnewsresource.com/article62341.html

Also http://www.hotel-online.com/News/PR2012_2nd/Apr12_WorldEconomy.html

www.hospitalitynet.org/news/4055516.html